Page 201 - Livre Beau Rivage Palace
P. 201

Fig. 8           Fig. 9                                                  Fig. 10

 Geneva area in the Hôtel des Trois-Couronnes in Vevey (1842),  of drawers, washbasin, couch, a table by the window and two or three chairs,   have supplied the hot water tap they had planned to have on each   slightly protruding pavilions. The roof featured three glass skylights
 the Hôtel de la Paix in Geneva (1865) and the Grand Hôtel de   and [they had] even managed to achieve a very satisfying result in the   floor; this was axed by Rufenacht, however, arguing that ‘pipes are   illuminating the main entrance hall and the two service stairwells
 Vevey (1867, subsequently demolished). In the era of gas lighting,  smallest rooms, but they had not been able to do this without extending   troublesome and can cause damage, and it is the duty of the staff to bring   and their courtyards (situated at the centre of the receding structures).
 architects of large buildings were particularly fond of the effect   the size of the building’.    pitchers of hot water to the guests’ rooms’.  It seems that Rufenacht   The external decoration, in molasse (a type of stone composite local to
                                                 29
 21
 created by a central ‘well’ of light at the very heart of a structure.   Rather than adapting Gindroz’s plan, the architects submitted   also rejected the proposal to install a bathroom on every floor    the region, consisting of sandstone, marls and other conglomerates),
                                                                      30
 As a superb focal point and the defining space of an establishment,  a scaled-down version of their original proposal. They removed   (which would have been the height of luxury at the time),  in the   was extremely sober and minimalist: the window frames featured
                                                                 31
 the lobby or atrium was considered to be the hotel feature par   one axis from each of the receding sections, bringing the number   interests of saving water. Plans were subsequently made for four   subtle crossette mouldings and casings linked to cornerstones on
 excellence by Eduard Guyer, who published a canonical work on   down to five, and reduced the size and number of public rooms;   bathrooms to be built in an outhouse which was to be constructed   the lower floors, and colossal pilasters on the two upper floors. The
 hotel architecture in 1874:  ‘The lobby, which is surrounded by rooms   some of the guest rooms (a few of which had sitting rooms)   to the north-west of the hotel, and was also to have contained ‘a   central structure was distinguished by the attic, whose balustrade was
 12
 used by almost all of the hotel’s guests in their day-to-day business, must   appeared in the east section of the ground floor,  while the   stable, shed, hayloft, woodshed and other utility rooms to service   carved with stylised palmette and leaf motifs, and the colonnaded
 22
 be very light and reflect the importance of the establishment: above all, it   domestic staff dining room was relegated to the basement. The   the hotel’.  This was never built either, and the bath cubicles were   porch, with columns surmounted by Ionic capitals. The only other
                          32
 is essential that the staircases be well illuminated, especially at the foot.  communal areas were concentrated in the west and centre of the   finally installed in the hotel basement. 33  decorative element was provided by a few balconies on the first two
                                                                                           36
 Skylights are normally used to provide more daylight.’ 13  structure, with the main dining room in the wing, a ‘breakfast and   The definitive plans, featuring receding sections with only   floors of the facades.  (fig. 11)
 private dining room, which may also serve as the dining room during the   four axes each, were approved by the board of directors on 27   Inside, the grand entrance hall was particularly sumptuous.
 THE EVOLUTION OF THE PLANS  winter season’,  and a ‘small drawing room with access onto the terrace’   January 1858. Two months later the board asked the architects   It was surrounded on all four sides by galleries whose supports
 23
 Bertolini and de La Harpe worked on four successive   facing the lake.  At the owners’ request, the architects reluctantly   to alter the roofing, finding that: ‘The upper part of the building is   became simpler as the floors decreased in height: composite faux
 24
 projects whose plans have now been lost,  while the design   converted the central lobby into a large hall to be divided into   somewhat unsatisfactory, since the uniformity of the roof design is not in   marble columns and marble-clad pilasters on the ground floor,
 14
 which was finally executed is known only from plans published   two separate rooms with opposing fireplaces. This solution was   harmony with the rest of the structure’.’  Bertolini and de La Harpe   fluted Doric columns on the first and second floors, smooth
                                               34
 15
 after the building’s completion, in 1869 and 1874.  The way the   the one finally chosen, with a drawing room and smoking room   therefore proposed to add ‘an attic onto each of the building’s main   columns on the third floor and pillars on the final floor (fig. 12).
 project evolved must, therefore, be pieced together from written   occupying the  designated space.  The  entrance hall  was also   sections, that is the central structure and the east and west wings. From an   The decoration of the capitals and cast-iron railings was conceived
 documents, in this case comments accompanying the first two   simplified: the two symmetrical staircases with three flights of   aesthetic point of view this is highly preferable, as it breaks the monotony   to follow the same hierarchical principle; the first- and second-
 preparatory projects,  along with reports made by the board of   stairs were replaced by a single, smaller staircase with only two   of the roofing proposed in the first plan, which followed a continuous line   floor railings were punctuated by centrally positioned standard
 16
 directors. The architects were initially asked to revise Gindroz’s   flights, like the one envisaged by Gindroz. At this stage, the project   across the central structure and the two wings; it also has the advantage of   lamps made from the same material. Before the lift was installed in
 project, since their own was judged to be too large and complicated;   still included plans to install ‘a mobile platform [in the entrance hall]   allowing for a considerable increase in the number of rooms’.  (fig. 10)  1888, the lower floors were more sought after and consequently
                                                              35
 25
 its cost was calculated at 830,000 fr. (with a capacity of 162 beds)   for the raising and lowering of objects’.  This technological innovation,   Construction work on the hotel began in spring 1858 and   better furnished: the luxury apartments, with bedrooms and
 17
 as opposed to 731,000 fr. for that of Gindroz (102 beds).  The   again originally presented by Gindroz, was a precursor to the lift,   the first foundation stone was laid in an official ceremony on 17   drawing rooms, were all located on the first and second floors of
 developers had only budgeted 500,000 fr., which was supposed   which only made its first appearance in Switzerland in 1867 in   August 1858. The excavation and masonry contracts were awarded   the main building and side wings (figs 13 and 14).
 to cover ‘the building, outhouses, courtyards, gates, railings, porter’s lodge   the Grand Hôtel de Vevey; the Beau-Rivage Palace’s own ‘mobile   to Louis Corbaz and Georges Krieg respectively. The carpentry   In 1874, Eduard Guyer considered the Beau-Rivage to be
 and terraces’.  The first preparatory project, which allowed for only   platform’ was eventually abandoned at the behest of Alexandre   was executed by Charles Regamey, and the slate roofing by Jean  ‘ground-breaking within the hotel industry’ adding that it ‘may still
 18
 26
                                                                                                         37
 86 beds, was still over budget at 600,000 fr., and the architects   Rufenacht,  who became involved in the project as the hotel’s   Schittenhel. M. Bouché was put in charge of the ironwork, on the   be regarded as a model in many ways’,  notably for its excellent
 themselves were not happy with it, considering it ‘too cramped’.    future general manager.  condition that he liaise with Charrière & Larpin, another sub-  lighting: ‘On every floor the lobby extends north as far as the entrance
 19
 They wanted to ‘increase the proportions of the apartments, the smoking   There is a fair amount of information on the heating and   contractor. For the marble paving, the final contracts we know of   facade, providing it with extra daylight in addition to that entering from
 room, the private dining room and even the domestic staff dining room’,    plumbing systems. In their first preparatory project, the architects   were awarded to David Doret of Vevey for the ground floor, and   the skylight; this principle is also followed in the corridors […] of the
 20
 reminding the board that:  ‘In their competition project [they had]   mentioned a ‘steam (or arc or hot water) heating system’,  no doubt   to Turel of Lausanne for the first floor.  side wings, although it must be said that while this is extremely well
 27
 paid the greatest attention to furnishing each room appropriately, since in   rejected because every room had its own fireplace. They also talked   The hotel opened on 24 March 1861. The Neoclassical-  thought out, it is also a considerable luxury that not every hotel is able
 addition to the beds and night tables, each room was to have a […] chest   of ‘a hot and cold running water system’,  which was probably to   style building comprised nineteen axes punctuated by three   to emulate’. 38
 28
 < Fig. 7   Samuel Késer-Doret architect, Proposed hotel at Ouchy. Layout drawing   Samuel Késer-Doret, architect, Proposed hotel at Ouchy.   Hôtel Beau-Rivage, Ouchy. Elevation of the main facade as built.
 François Gindroz architect, Ouchy. Hôtel Beau-Rivage. South facade [1857].  [plus contour map of plot] [1857].  South facade [1857].
 The glass roof above the main body of the building was later added in pencil.  Competition entry under the slogan: L'esprit est comme l'or, c'est l'usage
 qui en fait le mérite (The mind is like gold, it should be used well).

 200                                                                                                                         201
   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206