Page 217 - Livre Beau Rivage Palace
P. 217

Fig. 2  Fig.3                                                            Fig.4

 the existing building would have been even less practical for the   good organisational skills. The latter was therefore asked to project   building. Secondly, Jost was unable to put together the same kind   between the Palace and the Beau-Rivage, namely the domed hall
 Beau-Rivage, as guests would have had to negotiate a series of   manage the main building work, from drawing up the plans to   of team that he had employed on his various Montreux building   to the south (now La Rotonde) and the dining room with its
 long corridors to reach the dining room (which was to remain   supervising the site, or, at least, the sub-contractors and work (the   projects (made up of experienced craftsmen and artists who were   stained-glass roof to the north (the Sandoz Room) (fig. 1). Each
 in the west part of the building), and room service would have   construction work having been sub-contracted to companies who   guaranteed to be efficient and produce good-quality work). Many   of these sections evoked other hotel buildings of the era, notably
 been problematic. One final requirement was that the new wing   would later be criticised for their lack of professionalism).  Jost   businesses in Montreux at that time  relied solely on the hotel   those designed by Jost. Thus, the arcade also appeared in a number
 20
 21
 must not overly ‘compromise the aesthetics of the Beau-Rivage within   and his partner Maurice Schnell,  on the other hand, seem to have   industry for their livelihood, and consequently had to maintain   of hotels in Montreux: the Hôtel National (1896), the Hôtel
 16
                                                                  26
 its grounds’,  a condition which appeared particularly hard to fulfil.  been more involved with the interior design and furnishings, and   high standards in order to satisfy their exclusive clientele;  this   des Alpes in Territet (1904) and, scaled-down, in the Montreux-
 In fact, the shareholders were so concerned that a new building   notably devised the decoration schemes for the hall and dining   was not the case in Lausanne, where the market was wider and the   Palace (1906). The accommodation section also resembled some
 ‘would have too much of a detrimental impact on the appearance of the   room; they also appear to have designed some of the furniture,   commissions more varied in both the public and private sectors.  of Jost’s Montreux hotel buildings, both in layout and elevation,
 Beau-Rivage and make it look too functional’  that they called for a   quite a rarity in the case of a hotel. 22  Although the Société d’Ouchy was a big client, it was certainly not   including the Hôtel des Alpes and the Montreux Palace, the main
 17
 second hotel to be built higher up, on the Élysée plot of land   It was hoped that the building project would be completed   the only one, and the companies it sub-contracted to did not give   difference in the Palace being the absence of a central monumental
 which they also owned.   quickly, but in 1906 it was severely held up by the workers’ strikes    it their undivided attention.  pavilion. Finally, the section containing the public rooms situated
 23
 In 1904, after having studied each of these issues at length, the   and the oversights of the building contractor Chessex-Krieg, who   Despite the constant setbacks, the project got back on track   between the two buildings (one of which was the original hotel)
                                                             27
 general assembly of shareholders opted for a wing to be built on the   employed only a hundred or so builders, labourers, hod-carriers   and the pace of work accelerated in 1907 and 1908.  The outer   was also present in the Hôtel des Alpes and the Montreux Palace.
 west side of the old building.  The construction of the Simplon   and stone cutters on the Palace, a workforce considered to be well   structure was completed in summer 1907 and work on the interior   The Ouchy Palace did not, therefore, represent a new architectural
 18
 Alpine railroad tunnel connecting the Swiss towns of Brig and   short of what was required to make up for the delays.  The board   began that autumn, although this was not without its own problems:   model; its interest lies rather in the way the architects applied a
 24
 Domodossola, scheduled to open in 1906, had stimulated a lot of   stated bitterly that: ‘If the construction work is not completed by the end   in the dead of winter, the painter Otto Haberer repeatedly insisted   tried-and-tested formula to a given situation.
 hotel-building activity in the region, and explains the sudden fast-  of June there will be no question of opening in spring 1908, and we should   that heating be provided in order for him to carry out his work   Initially, the Palace’s position on a slope above the Beau-
                                              28
 25
 tracking of the Beau-Rivage project; however, while the Montreux   be ashamed of our inability to build our hotel in two and a half years.’  It is   in the freezing-cold dining room.  The board minutes reported   Rivage might seem confusing for visitors arriving at the hotel, since
 19
 Palace rose to the challenge,  the Beau-Rivage Palace missed   certainly true that other luxury hotel schemes in the region, notably   that during the night of 18 June 1908: ‘We created a tunnel passage   the location of the main entrance is not immediately obvious (it
 the strategic deadline by two years. In the end, enlarging one of   those constructed by Jost, had been finished with lightning speed:   through the old dining room to connect the two buildings. Service began   is, in fact, at the end of the road). As with many other hotels of the
 Lausanne’s pre-eminent hotels would be fraught with difficulties.  26 months for the Caux Palace, for example, and only 22 for the   with lunch at 12.30 p.m. in the new dining room. That same evening,  same era, each of the wings has its own entrance, which means that
 The board was so anxious for the new building to harmonise   Montreux Palace. Up to 320 labourers worked on the Caux Palace   several rooms [in the Palace] were occupied by guests.’  It had taken   the main doorway does not instantly stand out, in contrast to most
                                                            29
 with the old one that it asked three different architectural practices   in the summer time. This urgency was undoubtedly a question of   almost three years to construct a building which was ultimately   city-centre establishments (one need only think of the Lausanne
 to produce preparatory plans: Van Muyden had retired through   pure maths: while a hotel remained closed, it could not provide a   smaller than the luxury hotel buildings of neighbouring resorts;   Palace of 1915, whose front porch is visible from as far away as the
 illness, so Louis Bezencenet, Henri Verrey and Alfred Heydel and   return on the shareholders’ investment. On another level, however,   nonetheless, the results made the wait worthwhile.  Place Saint-François). There are several indications that the door
 Eugène Jost were consulted. Bezencenet was well established in   this race against the clock was also symbolic: the faster a building   of the Palace is only of secondary importance. The absence of a
 Lausanne, having already worked on dozens of important building   was seen to go up, the more financial power its commissioning   TWO FACADES  central pavilion (mentioned above) reduces its visual impact, while
 projects, including the Hôtel  des Postes with Jost; Verrey and   body was perceived to have. The Société immobilière d’Ouchy   The new building comprised three distinct sections located   its location within a veranda makes it even harder to see; even the
 Heydel were well known to Morel, as they were the appointed   was therefore ‘ashamed’ of the length of time their building was   next to the existing 1861 Beau-Rivage. The first consisted of a raised   use of metal for the door suggests that it was not conceived as a
 architects of the Société climatérique de Leysin of which he   taking because it made them look weak in the face of the (better   platform which functioned as the Palace garden and, underneath,  grand entrance, since this was a time when the dictates of classical
 was a founding member and the director. After reviewing the   organised) competition. While the builders’ strike was entirely   an arcade and walkway; the second was the wing known as the   architecture, which held stone to be a more ‘dignified’ material, still
 preparatory projects, the board asked Jost to partner Bezencenet.  unforeseen, other factors certainly contributed to the unfortunate   ‘annexe’ (in fact, the Palace itself), designed in a horseshoe shape,  prevailed (figs. 2 and 3). The signs are clear for those who know
 Jost no doubt appealed to the board for his creative flair and   situation. Firstly, the appointment of Bezencenet to oversee the   whose principal (south-facing) facade was composed of two   how to read them: the formal entrance to the hotel is to be found
 ability  to  design  sumptuous  decorative  schemes  and  elaborate   building work; although his credentials both as architect and   lateral pavilions flanking the main longitudinal section, with a bay   in the middle (projecting) section of the original Beau-Rivage
 facades, whereas Bezencenet was a reliable entrepreneur with   builder were solid, unlike Jost he had little expertise in this type of   window at its centre; the third comprised the public rooms located   building. Guests must therefore walk along the entire length of

 J. Cornaz, architect, Hôtel Beau-Rivage Palace. Elevation.   The entrance to the Palace, known for many years as the winter garden.  Ouchy Lausanne, Hôtel Beau-Rivage, postcard, c.1913.
 Showing present condition [of the porch]. Lausanne, September 1949.      View of both buildings and the main body of the public rooms. The series of
                                                                          horizontal lines superimposed on each other from water level to roof makes the
                                                                          building stand out against the surrounding landscape.

 216                                                                                                                         217
   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222